Legal Opinion
Rupley v. Huntsman
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 10, 1958No. Civ. 9390PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
Plaintiffs above named have appealed from a judgment entered in favor of defendants after defendants’ demurrer to plaintiffs’ second amended complaint was sustained with leave to amend and plaintiffs had elected to stand on their complaint. Plaintiffs also appeal from a ruling of the trial court denying their motion for an order declaring defendants in default and guilty of laches, from the order of the court sustaining the demurrer to the second amended complaint, and from an order of the court denying plaintiffs’ motion to set aside and vacate the judgment.
The second amended complaint…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Stowe v. Fritzie Hotels, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Carruth v. FritchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Moxley v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hardcastle v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
- Muller v. ThautNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Zak v. State Farm Mutual Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- United States ex rel. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.