Legal Opinion
Bowman v. Fiorini
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided December 30, 2019No. 3:19-cv-00331Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION VIVIAN JANET BOWMAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:19-cv-331-DJH DAVID FIORINI et al., Defendants. * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court upon a motion to dismiss this action for failure to meet the notice-pleading standard of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 and for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (Docket No. 23). Fully briefed, this matter is ripe for review. For the following reasons, the Court will grant the instant motion. I. Pro se Plaintiff Vivian Janet Bowman filed the instant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bruce Beaudett v. City of Hampton City Attorneys A. Paul Burton and W. Stephen Moore Judge T.H. Wilson, II and Judge Nelson T. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.