Legal Opinion
Housing Authority of the City of Melbourne v. Richardson
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 21, 1967No. 957PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALDEN, Chief Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal from a chancery order which denied defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint
Plaintiffs are six individuals. Defendants are the Housing Authority of the City of Melbourne, the City of Melbourne and its Commissioners. The complaint prayed for an injunction prohibiting the erection of a low-rent housing project. It was based upon the alleged invalidity of a certain zoning ordinance and a certain cooperation agreement.
In 1963 the City of Melbourne and the Housing Authority entered into a written cooperation agreement for the purpose…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Josephson v. AutreySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Hartnett v. AustinSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of TallahasseeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Board of Com'rs of State Inst. v. TALLAHASSEE B. & T. CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Marvin v. Housing Authority of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Coral Gables v. SakolskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Rolling Oaks Homeowner's Ass'n v. Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- GERALNES BV v. City of Greenwood Village, Colo.District Court, D. Colorado · 1984
- Palm Beach v. Everglades Memorial Hosp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Jones v. BraxtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.