Application of Miller
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Primary Examiner in finally rejecting, for lack of invention over the references, the single claim of appellant’s application for a design patent for a new and ornamental design for a “Grease Jar,” shown in three figures of drawings forming a part of appellant’s application.
The references relied on are: Fay et al., D-23,100, March 6, 1894; Andrews, D-82,-966, January 6, 1931; Modern Packaging, August 1935, p. 6; American Hospital Supply Corporation, Catalogue No.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re FaustmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- In Re EppingerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
- Application of ParkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Application of WardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
3Cited by5 opinions
- Application of KruegerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Application of NeelyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Columbia Protektosite Co. v. Great American Plastics Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
- Application of Ferguson (Five Cases)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Application of VillesvikCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953