Bullock v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
James Sherman Bullock and Cynthia Prull Bullock appeal pro se a Tax Court order dismissing their petition to redetermine tax deficiencies for failure to state a claim. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App.P. 34(a).
Respondent issued a notice of deficiency to the Bullocks for the 1996 and 1997 tax years, disallowing undocumented deductions and determining deficiencies in income taxes paid of $7,037 and $5,623, respectively. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robert P. Wilcox v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Leonard Perkins v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Joseph A. Lefebvre v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- David M. Kearns and Janet Kearns v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Virginia L. Fox v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- (PC) Montecastro v. NewsomeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021