Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 8, 2001No. 00-1770PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

James Sherman Bullock and Cynthia Prull Bullock appeal pro se a Tax Court order dismissing their petition to redetermine tax deficiencies for failure to state a claim. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App.P. 34(a).

Respondent issued a notice of deficiency to the Bullocks for the 1996 and 1997 tax years, disallowing undocumented deductions and determining deficiencies in income taxes paid of $7,037 and $5,623, respectively. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robert P. Wilcox v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Leonard Perkins v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  3. Joseph A. Lefebvre v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. David M. Kearns and Janet Kearns v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  5. Virginia L. Fox v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. (PC) Montecastro v. NewsomeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API