Legal Opinion

In re Oelrich

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 15, 1978No. Appeal No. 78-502PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) affirming the rejection of claims 1-5 in appellants’ application serial No. 452,050, filed March 18, 1974, for “Sub-Critical Time Modulated Control Mechanism,” under 35 USC 103 as obvious from U. S. Patent No. 3,430,536 for “Time Modulated Pneumatically Actuated Control *87Mechanism,” issued March 4, 1969, to John A. Oelrich, one of the present joint applicants. We reverse.

The invention relates generally to control mechanisms used, inter alia, to move steering fins on guided missiles.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In re PearsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. In re WigginsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  4. In re MengCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  5. In re PalmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Delta Resins & Refractories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. In re OelrichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  3. In Re Frank N. Piasecki and Donald N. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. In re EhrreichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  5. Imperial Chemical Industries, PLC v. Henkel Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API