Legal Opinion
Alfredo D. Arellanes v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 6, 1964No. 18721_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Circuit Judge:
The district court has denied appellant’s motion, under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, to vacate and set aside a sentence for violation of the Jones-Miller Narcotics Act. That order is the subject of this appeal.
The district court action was based upon its ruling that “All of the issues raised in the petition filed herein are the same issues as were discussed and ruled upon by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in reviewing the judgment of conviction (see Arellanes v. United States, 302 F.2d 603 at page 610).”
In our judgment, the district court was in error in its appraisal…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Charles Earl Brubaker v. Fred R. Dickson, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Alfredo Delgado Arellanes and Geneva Arellanes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
3Cited by16 opinions
- Chester Nelson v. People of the State of California, Robert A. Heinze, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Martinez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- Frank M. Williams v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Roy W. De Welles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- Jesse Eugene Dearinger and Theodore J. Weinreich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.