State v. Young
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Per curiam
Willie Young appeals from a conviction following a trial to the court of violating the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, RCW 69.50.
Young’s sole contention on appeal is that his conviction should be reversed because physical evidence was obtained from his person by methods which violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Following a hearing on Young’s motion to suppress, the trial court entered the following findings of fact:
[O]n August 2, 1974 . . . Detective Victor Heins and Detective Karl Ahl of the Seattle Police Department Narcotics Division were patrolling in the area…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- People v. BracamonteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. Roosevelt HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Foxall v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- People v. HollowayMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. WinfreySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.