Legal Opinion

United States v. Livdahl

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided October 17, 2005No. 05-60021-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

COHN, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation prepared by United States Magistrate Judge Lura-na S. Snow [DE 150]. Defendants Toxin Research International, Inc., Powderz, Inc., Z-Spa, Inc., The Cosmetic Pharmacy, Inc., Chad Livdahl, and Zahra Karim filed objections [DE 364], The Government filed a response to Defendants’ objections [DE 370], Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court conducted a de novo review of the entire court record and is otherwise fully advised in the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Medical Center Pharmacy v. GonzalesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API