Legal Opinion · Dissent

Christian v. Village of Herkimer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1957Published

1DissentMcCukN, P. J.

The pivotal question upon which our decision hinges, is when did the cause of action accrue within the purview of section 341 of the Village Law. Unless otherwise provided by statute, a cause of action accrues so as to start the running of the Statute of Limitations at the point when the plaintiff may institute and maintain the action and not before. (Halsted v. Silberstein, 196 N. Y. 1, 16; Cary v. Koerner, 200 N. Y. 253; Jacobus v. Colgate, 217 N. Y. 235, 241, 245; Cameron Estates v. Deering, 308 N. Y. 24, 30; see, also, 54 C. J. S., Limitations of Actions, § 109; Bouvier’s Law Dictionary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Transit Commission v. Long Island RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Reining v. . City of Buffalo, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Winter v. . City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Murphy v. . Village of Fort EdwardNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API