Legal Opinion · Concurrence

John Varhol v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, D/B/A Amtrak

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 13, 1990No. 88-2207Published

1Concurrence

FLAUM, Circuit Judge,

joined by BAUER, Chief Judge, WOOD, Jr., CUDAHY, RIPPLE and KANNE, Circuit Judges, concurring.

John Varhol won a jury verdict against Amtrak for $237. Immediately after the court discharged the jury, counsel for Va-rhol informed the district judge that he wished to file a post-trial motion for a new trial. With no objection from Amtrak, the court gave him 21 days. The next day, the court entered the jury verdict. On the twenty-first day, Varhol filed a motion for a new trial in accordance with the court’s order.

In its reply, Amtrak responded with Rules 59(b) and 6(b). Rule…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Hallstrom v. Tillamook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API