Legal Opinion

Bunn v. Offutt

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 5, 1976No. Record 750093PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Edward DeV. Bunn and Sandra M. Bunn noted this appeal from a final decree of the lower court holding that they do not have an easement to go upon property owned or controlled by the appellees, T. J. Offutt, Temco, Inc. and Dittmar Co., Inc., and to use a swimming pool located thereon.

The evidence was heard ore tenus and the following appears from the statement of facts. On July 9, 1962, Temco, Inc. conveyed to Harvey W. Wynn and Rosabelle G. Wynn property known as 900 South Wakefield Street in Arlington. Prior thereto, on January 26, 1962, the Wynns had signed a contract of purchase prepared…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hamlin v. PandapasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  2. Buckles v. Kennedy Coal CorporationSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  3. Portsmouth Gas Co. v. ShebarSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968
  4. Hodgson v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Prospect Development Co. v. BershaderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  2. Brown v. HaleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  3. United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
  4. Management Enterprises, Inc. v. Thorncroft Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  5. United States Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API