Legal Opinion
Shingler v. Furst
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 20, 1933No. 9120PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Mrs. Charlotte J. Furst brought suit against .Mrs. Maude Y. Shingler as executrix of Joe M. Shingler, upon a note executed by Joe Mi Shingler and payable to Mrs. Furst. The defendant filed an answer in which she attempted to plead as a set-off a’ note executed by Mrs. Furst and indorsed to “Maude Y. Shingler, ex.” In aid of this defense the defendant sought to invoke affirmative relief as in a court of equity, based upon the alleged non-residence and insolvency of the plaintiff. Cf. Hecht v. Snook, 114 Ga. 921 (41 S. E. 74); Hilton v. Rogers, 152 Ga. 658…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hecht v. Snook & Austin Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- People v. Cal. Safe Deposit & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Dozier v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Porter v. Davey Tree-Expert Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Jennings v. William W. Wright & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1875
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Delray Incorporated v. ReddickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Bank of the Ozarks v. DKK Development Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- City of Rome v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939