Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Folsom

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided October 10, 1958No. 755PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. MILLER, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action under Title 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 405(g), to review an adverse final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, under the Social Security Act. By proper procedures the plaintiff sought an administrative determination that he was entitled to a “period of disability” and disability benefits under the Social Security Act, Title 42 U.S.C.A. Secs. 416 and 423. The Referee denied the relief sought. The plaintiff exhausted his administrative remedies, and the Referee’s decision became the final decision of the Secretary.

This…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Fuller v. FolsomDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1957
  3. Bostick v. FolsomDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1957

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Klimaszewski v. FlemmingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Charles W. Teeter v. Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  3. Ellerman v. FlemmingDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1960
  4. Blanscet v. RibicoffDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1962
  5. Dollie Kohrs v. Arthur S. Flemming, as Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API