Legal Opinion
Ratcliff v. Fibreboard Corp.
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided October 20, 1992No. A-92-CA-597PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NOWLIN, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Plaintiffs Motion to Remand, filed October 19, 1992. Having reviewed and considered this motion, the response, the arguments of counsel, and the applicable law, this Court is of the opinion that the motion should be DENIED.
BACKGROUND
This action was set for jury selection and trial yesterday in state court. At approximately 8:30 a.m. yesterday morning, on behalf of all of the Defendants, the Defendant Owens-Corning removed this case to federal court.
On the same day that this action was removed, this Court held an expedited hearing to consider…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Getty Oil Corporation, Succeeded by and a Division of Texaco, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Gus Poulos and A.G.P. Marketing v. Naas Foods, Incorporated and Ranks, Hovis, McDougall Plc Group (Rhm Holdings U.S.A. Incorporated)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- George Farias v. Bexar County Board of Trustees for Mental Health Mental Retardation ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Luther Weems v. Louis Dreyfus CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- James Johnson and Anne Johnson, Dresser Industries, Intervenor-Appellant v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- MCI Sales and Service, Inc. v. HintonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Valspar Corp.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2010
- Richard v. WildeMassachusetts Superior Court · 2001
- Castaneda v. RodriguezDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
- D.T. v. M.S.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.