Legal Opinion
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 27, 1997No. 95-1193, 95-1194, 95-1200, 95-1201, 95-1207, 95-1208, 96-1081, 96-1111, 96-1112 and 96-1114PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG.
GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:
In these consolidated petitions several local exchange carriers (LECs) challenge two orders of the Federal Communications Commission holding that they violated the Commission’s rules by assessing certain resellers of 800 service excessive carrier common line (CCL) charges. Specifically, the Commission concluded that the petitioning LECs were liable to the resellers for a partial refund of the CCL charges because the LECs had assessed the resellers two terminating CCL charges (rather than one terminating and one…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Pacific Bell, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Los Angeles Smsa Limited Partnership v. Federal Communications Commission, Leonard Communications, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Arlington v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Campos v. Ticketmaster Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Iowa Network Services, Inc. v. Qwest Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2005
- Beehive Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.