Legal Opinion

Feenstra v. Tanis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1906No. Docket No. 58Published

Case made from Ottawa; Padgham, J. Replevin by Arthur Feenstra and Jane Feenstra against Edward Tanis. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, C. J.

Plaintiffs are husband and wife. They own a farm and carry on the business of farming ;and market gardening. About one year before this suit was commenced plaintiff Arthur Feenstra, who then, owned several cows, purchased three additional cows from ■one Berkompas. Subsequently Berkompas obtained a judgment against said Arthur Feenstra for the purchase price of said three cows. Execution was issued upon said judgment and placed in the hands of defendant, who was a constable, with directions to levy the same. Said defendant, as constable, levied upon the three particular ■cows sold by Berkompas…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. WhitmoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Stilson v. GibbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Lillibridge v. WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Parker v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API