People ex rel. Lincoln County v. George
Idaho Supreme Court
On the twelfth day of June the plaintiff and relator filed a notice of motion to vacate and set aside the decision of the court so rendered in the case, and to grant a new trial therein, with which motion, and as accompanying the same, was due proof-of service upon the defendant and his attorneys in the case.
Read the full summary
On the twelfth day of June the plaintiff and relator filed a notice of motion to vacate and set aside the decision of the court so rendered in the case, and to grant a new trial therein, with which motion, and as accompanying the same, was due proof-of service upon the defendant and his attorneys in the case. The notice specifies the following as the grounds and basis of the motion: 1. Insufficiency of the evidence to justify the decision; 2. The said decision is against the law; 3. Errors in law occurring at the trial and excepted to by the plaintiff. Professor Cooley, at page 192 of his…
1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.
A petition for writ of mandate was heretofore filed in this court by the relator against the defendant. Verj’- able and lengthy arguments were heard at the April term, at Lewiston. The court having, by agreement of counsel, taken the cause under advisement, decided the same at Boise City, on May 6, 1891. Opinions, not then being fully prepared, were afterward filed on the third day of June, 1891 (People v. George, ante, p. 72, 26 Pac. 983), and this motion for new trial was placed on file June 12th. Counsel for defendant-now move to strike said motion from the files, and said cause from the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Knight v. RocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Benjamin v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- People ex rel. Lincoln County v. GeorgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1891
- Gregory v. HaworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- People v. HollowayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Julien v. BarkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Hampton v. DilleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1892
- Tucker v. Hypotheek Mining & Milling Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1918
- Lay v. Idaho State School & ColonyIdaho Supreme Court · 1943