Legal Opinion

Jewish Mental Health Society v. Village of Hastings

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 2, 1936No. 729Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from the Supreme Court of New York.

2Per curiam

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U. S. 365, 387-389; Jack Lewis, Inc., v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore et al., 290 U. S. 585; Cusack Co. v. Chicago, 242 U. S. 526, 530, 531; Hadacheck v. Los Angeles, 239 U. S. 394; Reinman v. Little Rock, *697237 U. S. 171, 176, 177.

Messrs. Sidney Newb'org and Edward M. Bassett for appellant. Mr. Frank H. Myers for appellees.

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Reinman v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Jack Lewis, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1933