Legal Opinion
Automatic Plastic Molding, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 28, 2003No. SLIP OP. 03-94; Court 99-00365PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EATON, Judge.
Before the court is the application of Automatic Plastic Molding, Inc. (“APM”), for fees and expenses pursuant to USCIT Rule 68 and the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (2000). For the reasons set forth below, the court denies this application.
BACKGROUND
In the underlying action APM challenged the United States Customs Service’s (“Customs”) 1 classification of certain glass containers. After a three-day trial the court held for APM, and found that the merchandise was properly classifiable under subheading 7010.91.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- William J. Kerin, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. United States Postal Service, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Gavette v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Former Employees of Oxford Automotive U.A.W. Local 2088 v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004