Legal Opinion

In re the Detention of Anderson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 25, 2006No. 31915-2-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Deren, J.

¶1 John Charles Anderson appeals the trial court’s decision to civilly commit him as a sexually violent predator under chapter 71.09 RCW. He argues that the trial court erred when it (1) admitted statements he made during his treatment at Western State Hospital (WSH), (2) found he committed a recent overt act, and (3) refused to allow his chosen expert’s testimony. Holding that the trial court erred in refusing to appoint a testifying expert for Anderson, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

I. FACTS

1. Criminal History

¶2 In 1988, at age 17, Anderson anally raped a two and a half year old…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In re the Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Detention of AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In re the Detention of AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In re the Detention of AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  4. In Re The Detention Of: Garth Snively, App. v. State Of Washington, Dshs, Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. In re Det. of AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API