Legal Opinion

Matter of Nackson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 29, 1989PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

O’HERN, J.

We are asked to consider whether the attorney involved in this case properly declined to disclose to a grand jury the whereabouts of a client who had consulted the attorney about a fugitive warrant. We find that the balance between the public’s right to every person’s evidence and the need for confidentiality in the attorney-client relationship has been properly drawn, and affirm the Appellate Division’s judgment holding that, in the circumstances of this case, the attorney properly declined to disclose the information.

I

For purposes of this…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. SugarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. In Re KozlovSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Midwestern Gas Transmission Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. In Re Myron FarberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  3. State v. ScherzerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  4. Kinsella v. KinsellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  5. Parker v. M & T CHEMICALS, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API