Legal Opinion

City of Birmingham v. Wheeler

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1932No. 6 Div. 229PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

The complaint was brought under the Act of 1931, p. 370, authorizing an action of ejectment by the purchaser at a mortgage sale, and is identical with form 30 of section 9531 of the Code of 1923, and which said form is expressly prescribed by section 2 of said Act of 1931. The complaint was not therefore subject to the defendants’ demurrer going to the form of same.

The other grounds of demurrer go to the constitutionality of the Act of 1931. The act applies to all counties now having, or which may have according to any future census, 300,000 inhabitants. This was a single classification, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Crenshaw v. JosephSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. State ex rel. Gunter v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crossett v. St. Louis Fire and Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Cox v. Howard Hall CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Masters v. PruceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  4. Hogan v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  5. Constantine v. First Alabama Bank of BirminghamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API