Legal Opinion

Constantine v. First Alabama Bank of Birmingham

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 7, 1984No. Civ. 4551PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD N. SCRUGGS, Retired Circuit Judge.

This case involves the validity of two real estate mortgages given to the plaintiff, First Alabama Bank of Birmingham (bank).

The appeal of Mrs. Constantine, one of the defendants, was recently transferred to this court by the Supreme Court.

The evidence was presented before a jury and the trial court granted directed verdicts in favor of the bank in its action to recover the possession of a house and lot and as to an amended counterclaim of Mrs. Constantine. There was no dispute in the facts as to those issues which were of a “legal” nature, and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. City of Birmingham v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Montgomery v. Parker Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Davis v. National Homes Acceptance Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1981
  5. White v. City Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Constantine v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Edith Cooper v. Federal National Mortgage Association.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  3. Constantine v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Constantine v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API