Garfield v. United States
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES E. DOYLE, District Judge.
This is an action, instituted under the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et seq., for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiffs seek to rest liability on the alleged negligence of defendant.
The incident from which this action arose occurred within the State of Wisconsin and, therefore, under 28 U.S. C. § 1346(b), the law of the State of Wisconsin governs this action. The government has filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on the ground that it is not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Waube v. WarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Colla v. MandellaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Moran v. Quality Aluminum Casting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Garreans Ex Rel. Garreans v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Kesner v. TrentonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
- McCord v. Ohio Division of Parks & RecreationOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Stephens v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1979
- Boudreaux v. Sonic Industries, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.