Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Medina-Carrasco

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 2, 2015No. 13-10397PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge GRABER; Dissent by Judge FRIEDMAN.

OPINION

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Jose Medina-Carrasco pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation. The district court sentenced him to 55 months’ imprisonment, to be followed by 3 years’ supervised release. On appeal, Defendant claims that the district court erred procedurally by failing to state on the record the applicable sentencing guidelines range and erred substantively in calculating the applicable sentencing guidelines range. But Defendant’s plea agreement contained a waiver of appellate rights specifically precluding a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Alberto De La FuenteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. CopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Larry HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Medina-CarrascoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Rosa Hernandez-CastroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. SniderDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
  4. United States v. MutschlerDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
  5. Leffler v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API