Legal Opinion

Meyers v. Neeld

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1940No. 30740PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

This is an action for damages wherein the plaintiff charged the defendant with negligence, proximately causing injuries to him as the result of a collision with defendant’s automobile while plaintiff was riding a horse. The cause was submitted to a jury, resulting in a verdict for plaintiff, assessing his damages in the sum of $1,250, and finding against the defendant on his cross-petition. Motion for a new trial was overruled, and defendant appeals.

The record discloses that about 4:30 o’clock in the evening of January 27, 1938, the plaintiff, a farmer, was riding a saddle-horse, 10 or 12…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. LandauerNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Turner v. BennettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fulcher v. IkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Halliday v. RaymondNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Bixby v. AyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Bingaman v. Estate of BingamanNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Claim of SchroederNebraska Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API