Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 1, 1976No. 765SC483PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

The defendant assigns error to statements made by the trial judge in his instructions to the jury. The defendant maintains that the trial judge's statement of the State’s contentions amounted to an opinion on the facts in violation of G.S. 1-180 and that this error was compounded by the trial judge’s misstatement of the defendant’s contentions.

General Statute 1-180 reads as follows:

“Judge to explain law, but give no opinion on facts.— No judge, in giving a charge to the petit jury in a criminal action, shall give an opinion whether a fact is fully or sufficiently proven,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. StroudCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. VickersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. WesterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API