Legal Opinion

State v. Wagner

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 6, 1981No. 807SC689PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS Judge.

Defendant has assigned the following as error: the failure of the trial court to order certain testimony stricken from the record; the admission of defendant’s pre-arrest statement to police officers; the trial court’s refusal to allow certain testimony on cross examination of a witness for the State and a witness for the defendant; errors in the court’s instruction to the jury; and the failure of the trial court to allow defendant’s motion to dismiss at the close of the State’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence. We will discuss three of the assignments.

We hold that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. State v. GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MeadlockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. TurnageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. ConcepcionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  4. State v. ConcepcionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. State v. MeadlockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API