Legal Opinion

State v. Call

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 10, 1974PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DELAHANTY, Justice.

On September 21, 1972, a Cumberland County Superior Court jury found the Defendant, Daniel Call, guilty of robbery in violation of 17 M.R.S.A. § 3401. The State’s eyewitness to the crime was Robert Eaton, a part-time service attendant at the Mill Creek Shell Service Station in South Portland. Eaton testified that on the evening of July 21, 1972 he was working the four-to-twelve shift alone at the service station. It was a clear night and the station was well lighted. At approximately 11:15 p. m., a blue Ford Galaxy containing two men drove into the station. Both men got out…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Ronald Leaching, United States of America v. Jerome TremontCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  2. State v. PullenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  3. State v. O'ClairSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  4. State v. WilburSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  5. State v. TraskSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. McDonoughSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. Chenell v. Westbrook CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  3. State v. MathesonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  4. State v. FarmerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  5. State v. LittlefieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API