Legal Opinion

State v. Nord

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 17, 2001No. 00-1529-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOOVER, P.J.

¶ 1. The State of Wisconsin appeals an order suppressing William K. Nord's blood alcohol test results. At trial, Nord claimed that the implied consent statute, WlS. Stat. § 343.305(4), violated his due process rights because the statute misleads accused persons regarding the consequences for taking or refusing the test. The circuit court agreed and suppressed the blood alcohol test results. The State now appeals that order. Nord makes the same argument that he did in the circuit court. However, he fails to persuade us that the statute violates his due process rights. We therefore…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. County of Columbia v. BylewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. ZielkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. Hezzie R.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Chappy v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LOCHEMESCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API