Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Blackman Ex Rel. Blackman v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 28, 2011No. 10-7019Published

1Concurring in the judgmentWilliams, Senior Circuit Judge

I write separately to explain why appellees’ purported “law of the case” argument must be rejected and to offer a somewhat different interpretation of the statute from that of Chief Judge Sentelle.

Law of the Case; Waiver and Forfeiture

Under the doctrine of “law of the case,” a court may decline to reconsider the merits of its own prior rulings when the same point of law arises for the second time in the same case. The panel rightly notes that law of the case was not the basis of the district court’s decision. Maj. Op. at 1091; see also 2010 Fee Award Decision, 677 F.Supp.2d at 180.

More…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Hobart N. Crocker, Jr. v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc., Hobart N. Crocker, Jr. v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  5. Gates v. RowlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API