United States v. Alan Nohara
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Alan Nohara (“Nohara”) appeals his conviction for distributing methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). The primary issue is whether Nohara had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the hallway outside his apartment in his high security, high rise apartment building. We hold that he did not and affirm.
I
FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
At 11:40 p.m. on February 6, 1992, DEA agents arrested Barry Nobrega (“Nobrega”) for possession of methamphetamine. Nobre-ga agreed to cooperate against his supplier, Nohara. Nobrega told the agents he had been “fronted” nine…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- State v. BreuerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- United States v. James S. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- James Lyall v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Rodrigo Pino-NoriegaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.