Legal Opinion

United States v. Alan Nohara

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 27, 1993No. 92-10599PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Alan Nohara (“Nohara”) appeals his conviction for distributing methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). The primary issue is whether Nohara had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the hallway outside his apartment in his high security, high rise apartment building. We hold that he did not and affirm.

I

FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

At 11:40 p.m. on February 6, 1992, DEA agents arrested Barry Nobrega (“Nobrega”) for possession of methamphetamine. Nobre-ga agreed to cooperate against his supplier, Nohara. Nobrega told the agents he had been “fronted” nine…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. State v. BreuerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  2. United States v. James S. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. James Lyall v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. Rodrigo Pino-NoriegaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API