Legal Opinion

Williams v. Viswanathan

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided January 8, 2001No. 07-00-0414-CVPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON APPELLANTS’ DISQUALIFICATION AND RECUSAL MOTION

BOYD, Chief Justice.

Appellants have filed a motion seeking to disqualify Justice Phil Johnson and to recuse Justice Brian Quinn. Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 18b lists the reasons why a judge, which we assume would include an appellate justice, should disqualify himself or herself from participation in a pending matter, as well as the reasons why such a judge or justice should recuse himself or herself in a pending matter.

*687Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 16 deals particularly -with appellate judges and includes the procedure by which motions…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  3. Hinman v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Love v. WilcoxTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  5. United States v. Thomas A. Burger, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Inc., Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. Wright, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  2. McCullough v. Kitzman, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  3. Drum v. Calhoun, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  4. Williams v. Viswanathan, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  5. F.S. New Products, Inc. v. Strong Industries, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API