Legal Opinion

Board of Port Commissioners v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1937No. S. F. 15623PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeaweed, J.

Upon further reflection following the granting of the petition for a rehearing, we hereby readopt the original opinion delivered by this court in the above-entitled proceeding, with some slight changes, and by adding thereto such further reasons in support of our original conclusion as we have deemed proper in view of a re-presentation of the questions involved. We were also moved to grant the rehearing in order to give to certain parties who were not made parties in the proceeding, but who asserted beneficial interests in the subject-matter involved, an opportunity to be heard. The original…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Oakland v. Oakland Water Front Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Brown v. FerdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Reams v. CooleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. County of Los Angeles v. GravesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Hopkins v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. White v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Addison v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Penn Central Corporation v. U.S. Railroad Vest Corporation Beverly D. Crone, Auditor of St. Joseph CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API