Legal Opinion

Tasby v. Wright

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 27, 1982No. Civ. A. 3-4211-HPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES

SANDERS, District Judge.

This school desegregation case is once again before the Court, this time on the several applications for attorneys’ fees filed by Plaintiffs Tasby, et al., and Intervenors NAACP, Black Coalition to Maximize Education, and Cunningham. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court is of the opinion that the applicants are prevailing parties and are entitled to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees and necessary expenses from Defendant Dallas Independent School District (“DISD”).

Background

The Court’s task is to…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Harris County Outdoor Advertising Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Williamsburg Fair Housing Committee v. Ross-Rodney Housing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  3. Vaughns v. Bd. of Educ. of Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
  4. Spell v. McDanielDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985
  5. Harris v. MarshDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API