Legal Opinion

Fifield v. Edwards

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1878PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to Superior Court of Detroit. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

Edwards & .Murphy sued Eifield in the Superior Court of Detroit to recover the price of certain goods received by one A. B. Watson, but for which, as they claimed, Fifield had made himself responsible. The principal question made in the case was whether the judgment in a previous suit, wherein Francis W. Fifield and Eugene Fifield were plaintiffs and Edwards & Murphy were defendants was not a bar to this demand.

In the previous suit Edwards & Murphy relied upon this same demand by. way of set-off to the claim of the two Fifields against them. Judgment passed for the plaintiffs in that suit,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lawrence v. VernonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1837

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Latimer v. William Mueller & Son, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Callaway v. IrvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Stolaruk Corp. v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Mertz v. MertzMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API