Legal Opinion

Stolaruk Corp. v. Department of Transportation

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1982No. Docket 52513PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant’s motion for accelerated judgment based on the theory that plaintiffs suit in the Court of Claims was barred by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel was granted. Plaintiff appeals by right.

Plaintiff bid on certain highway construction projects planned by defendant and was declared the apparent second lowest bidder. However, an initial review of the bids showed that the lowest bidder had failed to conform with the projects’ specifications, so the defendant informed plaintiff that defendant would recommend to the Michigan State Transportation Commission that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Howell v. Vito's Trucking and Excavating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Taylor v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Greenfield Construction Co. v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Braxton v. LitchalkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1976 Pa 240Michigan Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lichon v. American Universal InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Latimer v. William Mueller & Son, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Knoblauch v. KenyonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Schlumm v. O'HAGANMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API