Williams v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
OVERSTREET, Judge.
A jury convicted Appellant of involuntary manslaughter and assessed punishment at confinement for seven years. The conviction was affirmed. Williams v. State, 814 S.W.2d 163 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th] 1991). We granted discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred by holding that juror note-taking is permissible despite the potential it creates for jury misconduct.
The Court of Appeals pointed out that in Hollins v. State, 571 S.W.2d 873 (Tex.Cr.App.1978), this Court was presented with the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hollins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Price v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gutierrez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- Mata v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
- David Lee Seaton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012
- Heriberto Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
- Jeremiah Nevarez v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.