Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Fraternal Mystic Circle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to St. Clair; Atkinson, J. Assumpsit by Christine Wallace against the Fraternal Mystic Circle on a benefit certificate. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.

This case has once been considered by this court. The opinion of the court on the former hearing is reported in 121 Mich. 263 (80N. W. 6). On a second trial the plaintiff recovered, and defendant brings error.

The assignments of error are numerous, but we find, on examination, that many of them raise questions which are concluded by our former decision, which has become the law of this case. We will, for convenience, treat such questions as are not concluded in substantially the same order adopted by counsel.

1. It was submitted to the jury to find whether the notice of assessment 21 (the one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Fraternal Mystic CircleMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. People ex rel. Roehler v. Mechanics Aid SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Krause v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Savage v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Grand Lodge, Ancient Order of United Workmen v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Rousseau v. Brotherhood of American YeomenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Great Camp Knights of the Maccabees v. SavageMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Bland v. BlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API