Legal Opinion

Madura v. McKillip

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1924No. 22932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

This is an action to recover a balance alleged to be due plaintiff on an oral contract for the sale of real estate. Plaintiff, who was the owner of 820 acres of land in Greeley county, alleges in substance that on September 20, 1919, he sold the same to defendant McKillip for $29,000, subject to a mortgage of $19,000; that $1,000 was to be cash in hand, $12,000 on or before March 1, 1920, and $16,000 by the conveyance to the plaintiff of 160 acres of land in Holt county, free and clear of incumbrance, which price was agreed upon by the parties. This agreement was to be reduced to writing by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bingaman v. BingamanNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Chicago Lumber Co. v. BancroftNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hein v. WT Rawleigh CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hein v. WT Rawleigh CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API