Legal Opinion

Camille v. Berry Fertilizers, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 14, 1975No. 12584-85 consPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trapp

Plaintiffs appeal from the order of the trial court which dismissed with prejudice a complaint seeking damages under “An Act relating to alcoholic liquors,” more commonly referred to as the Dramshop Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 43, par. 135).

The order for dismissal found that the legislative purpose of the statute was to regulate the liquor trade, that the defendants were not engaged in such business, and that the liquor was served to plaintiffs’ decedent as an incident to a social occasion.

The substance of the complaint is that the corporate defendants sponsored a “chicken fry” for guests…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Howlett v. DoglioIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Cruse v. AdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  5. Wessel v. Carmi Elks Home, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Charles v. SeigfriedIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Miller v. MoranAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Meany v. NewellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Richardson v. Ansco, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Heldt v. BreiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API