Legal Opinion

People v. Gentry

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 4, 1968No. Crim. 12961PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AISO, J. pro tem. *

—Defendant Fielden Lyle Gentry, Jr., was convicted by the court, sitting without a jury, on three counts of violating Penal Code, section 476a (feloniously issuing checks without sufficient funds) and appeals from the ensuing judgment. Defendant was represented at trial by private counsel. Upon appeal, this court acting upon his request appointed appellate counsel for him.

Appellant contends: (1) the court erred in finding him guilty and denying his motion for a new trial upon all three counts, because the uncontradieted opinion evidence of the court-appointed psychiatrist…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. WetmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. People v. NanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. People v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Archbishop Johnathan v. SheaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API