Legal Opinion
State v. Maybank
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided November 12, 2002No. 3566PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.
Dilando D. Maybank appeals his convictions for possession of crack cocaine, possession of cocaine, resisting arrest, and assaulting a police officer while resisting arrest. He argues the trial court erred in failing to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to a warrantless search of his motel room because the police went to his room as a result of an invalid traffic stop of his vehicle. We affirm.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In August 1999, Detective Christopher Arakas observed a vehicle with a temporary license tag being driven along Highway 501 in Myrtle Beach. Based solely on the presence of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. PichardoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
- State v. TindallCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- State v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- State v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.