Legal Opinion

Munroe v. Winegar

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Ottawa; Padgham, J. Bill by Stephen L. Munroe- against William Winegar, Luman Jenison, Lucius Jenison, and the First National Bank of Grand Rapids to quiet title. From a decree for complainant, and an order denying a rehearing, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Montgomery, O. J.

The original bill in this case was-filed to quiet complainant’s title, which he claims to own by virtue of a tax title for the taxes of 1893. Decree-passed in favor of the complainant, and later on the defendant bank filed a petition for a rehearing, which the court took under advisement, but finally denied. An *311appeal is taken both from the original decree and from the order refusing a rehearing.

It is contended that the tax title is invalid for the following reasons:

1. Under the decision in Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Wood, 115 Mich. 444 (74 N. W. 656).

2. Because the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peninsular Savings Bank v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Hughes v. JordanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Bacon v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Youngs v. PoveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanborn v. Lewis & Clark CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Virginia & West Virginia Coal, Co. v. CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918
  3. Haney v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Carpenter v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Klotz v. SloanMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API