Legal Opinion · Dissent

Knaggs v. City of Lexington

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1960No. 34859Published

1DissentCarter, J.

I cannot agree that causal connection between the accident and the coronary occlusion was established. Three physicians called by the defendant testified to a complete absence of causal connection. They testified that a coronary occlusion is a result of arterial disease of long duration. At a certain stage of its progress a coronary *147occlusion is inevitable and is unaffected by trauma unless the injury is directly in the area of the diseased portion of the anatomy. The decision in this case, however, rests on the evidence of two doctors called by the plaintiff.

Dr. Arthur M. Greene testified…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rose v. City of FairmontNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Ruderman v. Forman Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Pixa v. Grainger Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Nelson v. FRENCHMAN-CAMBRIDGE IRRIGATION DISTRICTNebraska Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API