Legal Opinion
City of Dallas v. Donovan
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided April 3, 1989No. 05-88-00807-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Justice.
The city appeals from an adverse judgment in a negligence lawsuit. In three points of error, the city contends that the trial court erred by admitting hearsay testimony, and that there was no evidence or insufficient evidence to support the judgment. We overrule these points of error and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Michael and Victoria Donovan, individually and on behalf of Erin, Timothy, and Mary Donovan, sued the city because of injuries that they suffered in a collision on January 14, 1984. The accident happened at an intersection in the Dallas city limits. A stop…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Richardson v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Burnett v. MotykaTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- American General Insurance Co. v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. MichlingTexas Supreme Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. GonzalezTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Malone v. Foster, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
- Glover v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- Liggens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- In Re Cohen, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.