Legal Opinion

Andres v. Keystone Varnish Co.

New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau

Decided January 3, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hí H< sfc ❖ Hí H*

From the testimony adduced and the stipulations of counsel, I find that the petitioner’s decedent, Frederick Andres, was employed by the respondent, Keystone Varnish Company, a New York corporation, as a salesman, to work partly in New York and partly in New Jersey. While the contract of employment was entered into in the borough of Brooklyn and State of New York, it appears without contradiction that the employe’s duties required him to perform a goodly part thereof in New Jersey. His work as a salesman contemplated the solicitation of customers in this state and thus obtain *75…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Belyus v. Wilkinson, Gaddis & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. American Radiator Co. v. RoggeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  3. Jackson v. New York Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Furda v. Scammell China Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API