Legal Opinion
Furda v. Scammell China Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 15, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
17 N.J. Super. 339 (1952)
86 A.2d 39
ANNA FURDA, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
SCAMMELL CHINA CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Mercer County Court Law Division.
Decided January 15, 1952.
Mr. William Reich, attorney for petitioner-respondent.
Messrs. Toner, Speakman & Crowley (Mr. Robert A. Vanderbilt appearing), attorneys for respondent-appellant.
HUGHES, J.C.C.
This is an appeal from a determination and judgment entered in the New Jersey Department of Labor and Industry, Division of Workmen's Compensation, which held in favor of the petitioner-respondent, hereinafter called the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Bank v. FulmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Matter of Connelly v. Samaritan HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Ervin v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
- James Smith Woolen Machine Co. v. HoldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- George v. Great Eastern Food Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Cairns v. City of East OrangeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993