Heitman v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HILL, Justice.
William Randolph Heitman appealed from his conviction by the court upon his plea of nolo contendere to the charge of possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver. His punishment was assessed at five years in the Texas Department of Corrections, now the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, probated for five years. The legal history of this case was contained within our last opinion and need not be repeated here. See Heitman v. State, 776 S.W.2d 324 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1989), rev’d, 815 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). Most recently, this…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kolb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Evers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Autran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Jurdi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Hatcher v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
- Manning v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1993
- State v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.